Honesty and cheating during university study

Marek Preiss, Alena Nohavová, Iva Stuchlíková

Abstract

The authors analyze honesty and cheating during university studies in relations to work, social and economic variables. In two pilot studies the authors focused on four topics – 1. attitudes of university students to cheating; 2. relation between cheating and work values among university students; 3. connection between cheating and religiosity; 4. relation between cheating and some socio-economic variables. Using two datasets they found high frequency of cheating among Czech university students in comparison with their American colleagues and the stability of findings in samples 2011 and 2012. Differences between honest and dishonest students were found in some variables of the Survey of Work Values (Wollack et al., 1971). Honest students had higher score in Activity Preference and Job Involvement, dishonest students had higher score in Social Status and Attitude Towards Earnings. No relation between cheating and religiosity was found. On archive data (Teixeira a Rocha, 2010) authors consider relations between cheating and some socio-economic variables – Gross Domestic Produkt, Corruption Perception Index, Human Development Index and Education Index. They also consider relations with economic development, perception of corruption, level of human development and education.

(Fulltext in Czech)

Keywords

cheating, academy, honesty, work values, religiosity

Literature

Albrecht, W., G. Wernz & T. Williams. (1995). Fraud: Bringing light to the dark side of business. Burr Ridge, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

Bernardi, R. A., Metzger, R. L., Bruno, R. G. S., Hoogkamp, M. A. D., Reyes, L. E. & Barnaby, G. H. (2004). Examinaning the decision process of student’s cheating behavior: an empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics 50, 397–414.

Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W. H. & Mudrack, P. (2008). The influence of ethics instruction, religiosity, and intelligence on cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 82, 557–571.

Borkowski, S. C. & Ugras, Y. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics; 17, 1117–1127.

Burton, J. H. , Talpade, S. & Haynes, J. (2011). Religiosity and test-taking ethics among Business School students. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 4, 1–8.

Cizek, G. J. (2003). Detecting and preventing classroom cheating. Thousands Oaks: Corwin Press.

Eisenberg, R. & Shank, D. M. (1985). Personal ethics and effort training affect cheating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 2, 520–528.

Eisenberg, J. (2004). To cheat or not to cheat: effects of moral perspective and situational variables on students’ attitudes. Journal of Moral Education 33, (2), 163–178.

Fisher, J., Kim, H. & Lee, S. CH. (1998). Stability of religious orientation and academic dishonesty. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 7, 1, 55–66.

Harding, T. S., Passow, H. J., Carpenter, D. D. & Finelli, C. J. (2003). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and professional behavior. Frontiers in educational conference, 3, S2A, 6–11.

Jolicoeur, J. R. (2010). Hellfire and academic dishonesty: An empirical evaluation of the influence of religious orientation on academic deviance. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri – Saint Louis, 197 pp.

Klein, A. H., Levenburh, N. M. , McKendall, M. & Mothersell, W. (2007). Cheating during the college years: how do business school students compare? Journal of Business Ethics 72,197–206.

Mareš, J. (2005). Tradiční a netradiční podvádění ve škole. Pedagogika 55, 310–335.

Nonis, S. & Shift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 2, 69–77.

Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. New York, Oxford University Press/Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Preiss. M. , Nohavová, A., Klein, H. A. & Stuchlíková, I. (2011). Na studiích podvádíme víc než Američané. Psychologie dnes, 17, 11, 56–59.

Preiss, M., Nohavová, A. & Dvorská, K. (2012). Podváděli ve škole. A co v práci? Psychologie dnes, 18, 6, 56–59.

Rest, J. R. (1979). Defining Issues Test. Minneapolis, MN: Center for the study of ethical development, University of Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press. Rocha, M. F. & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2005). College cheating in Portugal: Results from a large scale survey. FEP working papers, 197, 1–43.

Shipley, L.J. (2009). Academic and professional dishonesty: student views of cheating in the classroom and on the job. Journalism and Mass Commnunication Education 64, 1, 39–53.

Sims, R. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business 68 (4), 207–211.

Staats, S., Hupp, J. M., Wallace, H. & Gresley, J. (2009). Heroes don’t cheat: An examination of academic dishonesty and students’views on why professors don’t report cheating. Ethics & Behavior 19, (3), 171–183.

Teixeira, A. A. C. & Rocha, M. F. (2010). Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: an exploratory international assessment. Higher Education 59, 663–701.

Vrbová, J. & Stuchlíková, I. (2012). Školní podvádění starších žáků – pilotní studie. Pedagogika 62, 317–331.

Williamson, W. P. (2005). Religious orientation, incentive, self-esteem, and gender as predictors of academic dishonesty: An experimental approach. Archiv für Religionspsycho­logie / Archive for the Psychology of Religions 27, 137–158.

Wollack, S., Goodale, J.G., Wijting, J. P. & Smith, P. C. (1971). Development of the survey of work values. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 331–338.

Zebrowitz, L. A., Voinescu, L., Collins, M. A. (1996). “Wide-Eyed” and “Crooked-Faced”: Determinants of perceived and real honesty across the life span. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 22, 1258.

Show all Hide