The influence of individual characteristics and school environment on perceptions of the benefits of school discussions about civic issues

Dana Juhová
Hana Macháčková
Jan Šerek ORCID logo
Petr Macek

Abstract

This study examined the connection between selected class factors (open classroom, teachers’ role in discussions, relationships in the classroom and the type of the school) and individual characteristics (students’ engagement in discussions, their shyness, a need for cognition, the interest in politics, demographics) and students’ perceptions of the benefits of school discussions about social issues. The study used the data collected in a survey in 2014 from students of ninth grade of elementary schools and first grades in vocationally- and academically-oriented high schools in four regions in the Czech Republic; in this study, data from 729 adolescents (14–17 years) who experienced school discussions about social issues in the last year were analyzed. The results of multilevel linear model showed that discussions were perceived as more beneficial by students in classes with good relationship. Another positive link was found also with students‘ individual perceptions of open classroom, their perceptions of teachers‘ role in discussions as liberal, students‘ own greater engagement in discussions and their higher interest in politics. No link was found with gender, age, need for cognition or shyness. The findings can be beneficial for teachers to improve the quality of school discussions about civic issues.

(Fulltext in Czech)

Literature

Altermatt, E. R. & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related an motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 111–123. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C. & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic development. Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 275–280.

Brookfield, S. D. & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. Second Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131.

Campbell, D. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30(4), 437–454.

Caspi, A., Chajut, E. & Saporta, K. (2008). Participation in class and in online discussions: Gender differences. Computers & Education, 50, 718–724.

Centrum občanského vzdělávání (2012). Politika do školy patří: Metodický materiál pro učitele. Brno: MU.

Condra, M. B. (1992). The link between need for cognition and political interest, involvement, and media usage. Psychology, 29, 13–17.

Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2008). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Dole, J. A. & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.

Eckstein, K., Noack, P. & Gniewosz, B. (2012). Attitudes toward political engagement and willingness to participate in politics: Trajectories throughout adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 35(3), 485–95.

Flanagan, C. A. (2004). Volunteerism, leadership, political socialization, and civic engagement. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. Second edition (721–745). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Godfrey, E. B. & Grayman, J. K. (2014). Teaching citizens: The role of open classroom climate in fostering critical consciousness among youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1801–1817.

Henningsen, D. D. & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2004). The effect of individual difference variables on information sharing in decision-making groups. Human Communication Research, 30, 540–555.

Hess, D. (2002). Discussing controversial public issues in secondary social studies classrooms. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30, 10–41.

Hess, D. (2011). Discussions that drive democracy. Staženo z http://dm.education.wisc.edu/…ership-1.pdf

Hopko, D. R., Stowell, J., Jones, W. H., Armento, M. E. A. & Cheek, J. M. (2005). Psychometric properties of the revised Cheek and Buss shyness scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 185–192.

Hughes, K. & Coplan, R. J. (2010). Exploring process linking shyness and academic achievement in childhood. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(4), 213–222.

Kašparová a kol. (2008). Metodika tvorby školních vzdělávacích programů SOŠ a SOU. Praha: Národní ústav odborného vzdělávání.

Krosnick, J. A. & Alwin, D. F. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 416–25.

McIntosh, H., Hart, D. & Youniss, J. (2007). The influence of family political discussion on youth civic development: Which parent qualities matter? Political Science and Politics, 40(3), 495–499.

MŠMT ČR (2007). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro gymnázia. Praha: VÚP.

MŠMT ČR (2013). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. Staženo z http://www.msmt.cz/…i-vzdelavani

Niemi, R. & Junn, J. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Paulsen, E., Bru, E. & Murberg, T. (2006). Passive students in junior high school: The associations with shyness, perceived competence and social support. Social Psychology of Education, 9(1), 67–81.

Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Loersch, C. & McCaslin, M. J. (2009). The need for cognition. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (318–329). New York: The Guilford Press.

Prior, M. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics, 72, 747–766.

Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (173–195). New York: Academic.

Renninger, K. A. & Wozniak, R. H. (1985). Effect of interest on attention shift, recognition, and recall in young children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 624–632.

Ryan, A. M. & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437–460.

Ševců, M. (2010). Znalosti a dovednosti 14-letých v ČR z oblasti občanské výchovy. In P. Soukup (Eds.), Národní zpráva z Mezinárodní studie občanské výchovy (31–44). Praha: Ústav pro informace ve vzdělávání.

Širůček, J. (in press). Standardizace baterie sociální klima třídy. Praha: Národní ústav pro vzdělávání.

Širůček, J., Ťápal, A. & Linhartová, P. (2014). Potřeba poznávání: Studie psychometrických charakteristik zkrácené české verze Škály potřeby poznávání. Československá psychologie, 58, 52–61.

Torney, J. V., Oppenheim, A. N. & Farnen, R. F. (1975). Civic education in ten countries: An empirical study. New York: Wiley.

Torney-Purta, J. (1995). Psychological theory as a basis for political socialization research: Individuals' construction of knowledge. Perspectives on Political Science, 24(1), 23–33.

Torney-Purta, J., Barber, C. H. & Wilkenfeld B. (2007). Latino adolescents’ civic development in the United States: Research results from the IEA civic education study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(2), 111–125.

Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H. & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: civic knowledge at age fourteen. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

Václavík, V. (2005). Otevřené vyučování – opomíjená nabídka pro didaktické inovace. In R. Jandová (Ed.), Příprava učitelů a aktuální proměny v základním vzdělávání (39–41). České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita.

Václavík, V. a kol. (1997). Otevřené vyučování na příkladu vzdělávacího programu pro 3. ročník ZŠ. Praha: Agentura STROM.

Wentzel, K. R. & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209.

Youniss, J., McLellan, J. A., & Yates, M. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 620–631.

Zormanová, L. (2012). Výukové metody aktivizující. Dostupné na http://clanky.rvp.cz/…ZUJICI.html/

Show all Hide