System justification theory and its contribution to intergroup relations

Veronika Francová
Tereza Komárková

Abstract

This work introduces the readers to the System Justification Theory, which presents a new insight into the existing knowledge on intergroup relationships. While the System Justification Theory complements the already accepted theories such as the Social Identity Theory or the Social Dominance Theory, it also opposes and argues with them and proposes a research forcing us to think about intergroup relationships from a different point of view. The manuscript focuses at first on the definition of basic terms and the Theory’s hypot­heses; then it explains psychological mechanisms of justification of “the unfair” system; discusses the position and inner conflicts of disadvantage groups; focuses on the preference of the non-member group and on stereotypes as one of the principal forms of rationalization of social position; and finally, it mentions the discussion with other theories.

(Fulltext in Czech)

Keywords

system justification, status quo, stereotype, complementary stereotypes

Literature

Allport, G. W. (1954/1958). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge. MA: Addison-Wesley.

Aronson, E. (1995). The Social Animal. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.

Banaji, M. R., Greenwald, A. G., & Rosier, M. (1997). Implicit esteem: When collectives shape individuals. Paper presented at the Self & Identity Preconference, Toronto.

Blanton, H., George, G., & Crocker, J. (2001). Contexts of system justification and system evaluation: Exploring the social comparison strategies of the (not yet) contented female worker. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 127–138.

Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.

Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.) (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.

Goodwin, S., & Devos, T. (2002). American identity under siege: National and racial identities in the wake of the September 11th attack. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Columbus, OH.

Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219–236.

Hill, M. E. (2002). Skin color and the perception of attractiveness among African Americans: Does gender make a difference? Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 77–91.

Chanley, V. A. (2002). Trust in government in the aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and consequences. Political Psychology, 23, 469–483.

Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387–393.

Jost, J. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: An experimental paradigm for investigating the effects of socio-economic success on stereotype content. In G.Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89–102). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.

Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920.

Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.

Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000): Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.

Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153.

Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.

Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1122–1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Jost, J.T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305–333.

Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.

Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586–602.

Jost, J. T., Pietrzak, J., Liviatan, I., Mandisodza, A. N., & Napier, J. L. (2008). System justification as conscious and non-conscious goal pursuit. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 591–605). New York: Guilford.

Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2012). System justification theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 313–343). London: Sage.

Kay, A., Jimenez, M. C., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1300–1312.

Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.

Koukolík, F. (2010). Jak si zamilovat systém a být spokojený. Technet.cz. Dostupné z http://technet.idnes.cz/…sw/veda.aspx?…

Kouřilová, S. (2011). Jedinec v meziskupinových vztazích: od sociální kategorizace k předsudkům. Československá psychologie, 55, 12–24.

Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Shepherd, S. (2011). Self-Stereotyping as a Route to System Justification. Social Cognition, 29(3), 360–375.

Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 932–943.

Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion (pp. 11–12). New York: Plenum Press.

Levy, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2002). Implicit ageism. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 49–75). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lippmann. W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.

Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T. (2011). System justification theory: Motivated social cognition in the service of the status quo. Social Cognition, 29, 231–237.

Lukas, J., & Smolík, J. (2008). Psychologie vůdcovství. Brno: Computer Press.

Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group memberships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293–355.

Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1–8.

Moore, D. W. (2001, 9 October). Bush support rides wave of anti-terrorism: Ratings on job performance, personal characteristics soar (Poll analyses, Gallup Organization). Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/…t/login.aspx?….

Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dynamics, 6, 101–115.

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Jost, J. T. (2009). The politics of intergroup attitudes. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 480–506). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

Pelham, B. W., & Hetts, J. J. (2001). Underworked and overpaid: Elevated entitlement in men’s selfpay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 93–103.

Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: APA Press.

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173–211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151–167.

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sidanius, J., Singh, P., Hetts, J. J., & Federico, C. (2000). It’s not affirmative action, it’s the blacks: The continuing relevance of race in American politics. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 191–235). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332–362). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Spears, R., & Manstead, A. R. (1989). The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal Of Social Psychology, 19(2), 101–121.

Stapel, D. A., & Noordewier, M. K. (2011). System justification beliefs, affirmative action, and resistance to equal opportunity organizations. Social Cognition, 29(3), 231–237.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Tyler, T. R. (2011). Why people cooperate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Uhlmann, E., Dasgupta, N., Elgueta, A., Greenwald, A. G., & Swanson, J. (2002). Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America. Social Cognition, 20, 198–225.

Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Show all Hide