Implicit theories of scientific creativity

Alena Plháková ORCID logo
Eva Reiterová

Abstract

The study was aimed to chart the implicit theories of creativity of mathematicians and psychologists. The research sample consisted of 93 psychology students and 80 applied mathematics and informatics students at Palacký University in Olomouc who were asked to describe typical mental activities and behaviors of highly creative mathematicians and psychologists. From the contents of their replies, a list of these experts’ characteristic features was created. It was found out that the implicit theories of creative mathematicians included a good level of logical and analytical thinking, high natural intelligence, exactness, flexibility, absent-mindedness, and specific relation to the world to which belonged insulation from reality, closeness, poor communication skills, and sense of superiority toward non-mathematicians. The major components of the creative psychologist’s im­plicit theory are positive relationships to people, especially clients, the ability to produce new therapeutic procedures, to publish, and to carry out research. Other typical features are openness to new experience, persistence, nonconformity, flexibility, and broad horizons not only in the field of psychology but also in the area of culture and arts. Mental processes and behaviors ascribed to creative specialists appear to be closely related to the respective domain of science.

(Fulltext in Czech)

Keywords

implicit theories, creativity, expertise, intrinsic motivation

Literature

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Bačová, V. (2000). Súčasné smery v psychológii. Hľadanie alternatív pozitivizmu. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovské univerzity.

Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.

Crider, A. B, Goethals, G. R, Kavanaugh, R. D, & Solomon, P. R. (1989). Psychology. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.

Feist, G. J., & Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2(1), 3–47.

Goleman, D. (1997). Emoční inteligence. Praha: Columbus.

Kusá, D. (2007). Autonomy of creator and social processes: Otherness or positive deviance? Československá psychologie, 51 (Suppl.), 80–88.

Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (290–323). San Diego: Academic Press.

Miovský, M. (2006). Kvalitativní přístup a metody v psychologickém výzkumu. Praha: Grada.

Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 217–227.

Penrose, R. (1989). The emperor's new mind: concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Human Creativity (35–61). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Riggio, R. E., & Carney, D. R. (2007). Social skills inventory manual. Czech version. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.

Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350.

Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93–98.

Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211.

Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In Salovey, P., & Sluyter, D. J. (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence (3–31). New York: Basic Books.

Simonton, D. K. (2005). Creativity. In Snyder, C. R. & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (189–197). New York: Oxford University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.

Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Implicit theories: An alternative to modeling cognition and its development. In Bisandz, J., Brainderd, C. J., & Kail, R. (Eds.), Formal methods in developmental psychology: Progress in cognitive development research (155–192). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People’s conception of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37–55.

Tardy, V. (1972). Můj vztah k matematice. Nepublikovaný rukopis.

Vybíral, Z. (2006). Psychologie jinak. Současná kritická psychologie. Praha: Academia.

Wickes, K. N. S., & Ward, T. B. (2006). Measuring gifted adolescents’ implicit theories of creativity. Roeper Review, 28, 131–139.

Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Filozofické skúmania. Bratislava: Pravda.

Show all Hide