Sympathy as an „equivalent” to attractiveness of an aging female face
Attractiveness, including the face, is under the influence of evolutionary theory associated with youth, reproduction and a mate selection. The physically attractive face in this sense is a woman's face with clear sexually dimorphic (feminine) characters, symmetrical with average proportions and that, which possibly seems familiar to them. The vast majority of work dealing with a facial attractiveness uses for its assessment the static photographs of young women faces, whose average age does not exceed 25 years. The purpose of this study is not to deny the attractiveness of youth, but it is trying to find an answer to the question of whether even woman’s face bearing the signs of aging could be perceived as attractive by others. It was therefore used facial photographs of women aged between 50–65 years for evaluation, which were rated by 120 respondents, stratified by age and sex into four sub-groups – younger women, younger men, older women and older men. It turned out that to associate aging with a physical attractiveness is for evaluators unnatural and faces, which, by their own words, have been marked as „sympathetic“ gave to them the impression of a good character at first glance. It seems therefore, that in aging women is valued by others rather their „inner beauty“ and a personal attractiveness in the form of traits, attitudes, beliefs, values or interests that respondents can project to, for them attractive, older women face.
(Fulltext in Czech)
Keywordsattractiveness, aging, female face, sympathy, evolutionary psychology, social psychology, perception
Berman, P. W., O’Nan, B. A., & Floyd, W. (1981). The double standard of aging and the social situation: judgments of attractiveness of the middle-aged woman. Sex Roles, 7, 87–96.
Deutsch, F. M., Zalenski, C. M., & Clark, M. E. (1986). Is there a double standard of aging? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 771–785.
Enquist, M., Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, beauty, and evolution. Nature, 169–172.
Ferjenčík, J., & Nišponská, M. (1996). Vplyv výzoru tváre a sociálnej roly na vytváranie dojmu o osobe. Československá psychologie, 1, 39–45.
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.
Hume, D. K., & Montgomerie, R. (2001). Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of „quality“ in women and men. Evolution and Behavior, 22, 93–112.
Johnston, R. A., & Barry, C. (2001). Best face forward: similarity effects in repetition priming of face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54, 383–396.
Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health. Support for a „good genes“ explanation of the attractiveness-symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 417–429.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1972). Základy výzkumu chování. Pedagogický a psychologický výzkum. Praha: Academia.
Kowner, R. (1996). Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgement in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 662–675.
Laurence, M. W. (1964). Sex differences in the perception of men and women at four different ages. Journal of Gerontology, 19, 343–348.
Malatesta, C. Z., Fiore, M. J. & Messina, J.J. (1987). Affect, personality, and facial expressive characteristics of older people. Psychology and Aging, Vol 2(1), 64–69.
Marhánková Hasmanová, J. (2008). Genderové nerovnosti ve stáří: marginalizace a zvýhodnění žen ve stáří. Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, 8 (2), 28–36.
Mealey, L., Bridgstock, R. & Townsend, G. C. (1999). Symmetry and perceived attractiveness: A monozygotic co-twin comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (1), 151–158.
Mealey, L. (2000). Sex differences. Developmental and Evolutionary Strategies. Academic Press.
Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (6) 1035–1048.
Nowak, C. A. (1977). Does youthfulness equal attractiveness? In Looking Ahead. Eds. Troll, L. E., Israel, J. & Israel, K. Engelwood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 59–64.
Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A., & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 295–307.
Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 4, 659–669.
Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A., & McKay, R. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 31–46.
Rubenstein, A. J., Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (2002). What Makes a Face Attractive and Why: The Role of Averageness in Defining Facial Beauty. In: Rhodes G, Zebrowitz LA. (2002). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives. Ablex: Westport, CT.
Simmons, L. W., Rhodes, G., Peters, M., & Koehler, N. (2004). Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability? Behavioral Ecology, 15(5), 864–871.
Slaměník, I., & Výrost, J. (2008). Sociální psychologie 2. Přepracované a doplněné vydání. Praha: Grada Publishing.
Slaměník, I. (2011). Emoce a interpersonální vztahy. Vyd. 1. Praha: Grada Publishing.
Sontag, S. (1972). The double standard of aging. Saturday Review of Literature, 39, 29–38.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1364–6613, 452—460.
Ussher, J. M. (2006). Managing the monstrous feminine. Regulating the Reproductive Body. London: Routledge.